• Social Media Hasn’t Failed Advertising, We’ve Failed Ourselves

    / Comments (1)

    So the other day I read with interest the AdAge article called “Do Campaign Failures, High-Profile Firings Signal the End of Social Media?” It chronicled the downfall of Pepsi’s Refresh Project and Burger King’s many failed social media attempts, and it was the talk of digital and social media agencies everywhere.

    Now let me be clear – I do not subscribe to the conclusion of the article that social media is a failed experiment when it comes to affecting sales. However I do believe that these examples are case studies in where we’ve gone wrong as an industry.

    But let’s back up a bit and talk about how we got here.

    Back in the days of paid media, you forked out big bucks to get the audience you wanted – be it print, TV, whatever. You were guaranteed roughly 30 million households watching your commercial every time you bought the Cosby Show. That meant the number of eyeballs were not a metric, they were a given. The metrics ad agencies were actually held to were real business results. Did the client see a sales bump from the campaign? Did product move off the shelves?

    However with the rise of social media, the audience was not a given. We had to build an audience from scratch – it wasn’t as simple as writing a check. And so suddenly, metrics for ad agencies went from hard, real sales goals to things that had no direct connection to selling.

    Video views, “Likes,” number of fans or total reTweets became the ends instead of the ends to a means. We, as an industry, forgot what we’re really here to do – sell shit. And clients, in their attempt to quantify their efforts to their bosses, latched onto the easiest metric everyone understood. Both sides voluntarily lowered the bar and now we’re all paying the price.

    Burger King has continued to fall behind McDonalds despite industry-lauded social media efforts. Diet Coke trounced Pepsi and knocked them into third place despite tens of millions thrown at Refresh.

    Social media fansboys will shout “But Refresh was to build brand affinity, not sell more Pepsi!” If you can show me a company that is loved but doesn’t sell anything – I’ll show you a failed company.

    I’ll also show you a failed industry.

    I don’t think it’s a coincidence that as we’ve seen the rise of social media, we’ve also seen the rise of client dissatisfaction and the drop in marketing campaigns that have actually affected the bottom line. When we celebrate videos for hitting a million views instead of selling a million shoes, we’ve lost our way. When the number of “Fans” we get on Facebook is more important than the number of people who actually buy our clients’ products, it’s no wonder we’re seeing results like we’re seeing.

    Now it might not be as fun to create some crazy video that millions of people will “Like” just to see… and then have them never think twice about buying your product. But there’s nothing to say that social media can’t be used in the same way all other advertising should be used: to communicate a consumer benefit, convince them why they should choose you over the competition and get them to actually buy your product.

    --------

    Matt Morin is a freelance creative director in San Francisco and the author of The Dog & Pony Show blog. This piece was cross-posted from The San Francisco Egotist.

  • ATL Stands for Apathy City

    / Comments (23)

    This won't make me many fans but I could give a rat's ass. I'm calling it the way I see it: the Atlanta ad community sucks.

    I'm not saying there isn't talent here-- there is, lots of it. The problem is the attitudes and lack of passion and interest in our profession. This town takes apathy to new depths. Most Atlanta ad people only see each other once a year at the ADDY Show, then they crawl back into their shells to hibernate for another year.

    Meanwhile, the Atlanta Ad Club brings in terrific speakers like Ted Royer of Droga5, Mike Geiger from Goodby, Keith Grossman with Wired and on and on. These people are luminaries, visionaries who willingly share their wisdom and knowledge. Yet, too few Atlanta ad people make it out to see them, learn and be inspired, or socialize and network with fellow Atlanta ad pros.

    Why? I could blame the leadership of Atlanta's ad community, and I do. They don't support the Ad Club very well. Precious few agencies are corporate members, and even fewer encourage or pay for their people to attend. This lack of leadership and involvement is pathetic.

    But I also blame Atlanta ad professionals. These events are public, pimped hard, and easy to learn about by going to the Atlanta Ad Club website.

    This is your chosen profession, shouldn't you care about what's going on in our industry and getting to know the people in the Atlanta ad community who you may some day work with? I would think so.

    So, why do I even care? Well, for three years I was El Presidente of the Atlanta Ad Club and tried my damnedest to goose this ad community. I had some success, but not nearly enough for a city this size. We can do better, and we should do better. It's the only way we will ever get better. As long as I’ve been in this city, the ad people have pissed and moaned about why they can’t get more business; why don’t they get more respect? I believe Atlanta’s ad community apathy is at the root of why agencies like the Richards Group in Dallas dominate our local ad scene, and why so many Atlanta CMOs look beyond our borders for their agency partners.

    As an agency owner, I want Atlanta to be known as a great ad city. This will attract more talent, more business and more pride in what we do here.

    I'll keep working at it, but will you, Kings & Queens of Atlanta Ad Apathy?

    The "Scullin" from Ames Scullin O'Haire, Patrick serves as Chief Creative Officer and founding partner of the ADDY Best In Show winning agency. Patrick has created award-winning campaigns for agencies in San Francisco, Dallas and Chicago and hasn't yet given up on Atlanta. He fought the good fight for three terms as Atlanta Ad Club president and you can now find him blogging regularly at The Lint Screen. If you disagree with what he has to say, harass Patrick on Twitter @guzelvis.

  • Hug Your Copywriter

    / Comments (1)

    Originally posted on The Denver Egotist.

    As an ACD I spend a lot of time on conference calls, so it wasn't a big surprise that I found myself on one the other day. What was surprising was the energy on this one. Everyone was leaning in. People seemed more excited then usual. There was an unsaid understanding in the room and on the other end of the phone. It was like everyone suddenly remembered why they got into this business in the first place.

    On the monitor was the topic conversation: One word—and a picture that added up to one huge idea. When I realized that the guy responsible for the concept was nowhere to be seen I started tallying up the titles in the room: Creative Director, Account Director, Associate Creative Director, Regional Account Director, Sr. Art Director, Creative Technologist, Planner—not to mention the clients and partner agencies on speaker-phone. Everyone was buzzing to bring an idea to life. I couldn't help but think to myself: "all these people finally have something worthwhile to do thanks to a imaginative, articulate copywriter." Thank god.

    People don't work for people as much as they work for ideas. Nothing motivates or inspires us like a well-articulated thought. Technology doesn't drive business—ideas do, which is something that is easy to forget. As an industry we tend to value the flashy and new—over the tried and true, which is a big mistake. From my experience, no one is a more efficient generator of the ideas that drive our industry than a good-old copywriter. A good writer can articulate a vision for an ad, an agency, or a brand. A good writer shows us what it could be—what it should be, and can even outline a plan to get there.

    For me it all boils down to this: If you're doing boring work it's probably because you have a boring writer. If you have a good one—love them, nurture them, and please excuse them for being a little weird.

    Read more of Wade Campbell on his blog and on Twitter.

  • Egotist Spy Report: 2011 ADDY Awards

    / Comments (0)

    Our spies were out and about last Thursday night at the 2011 ADDY Awards, the annual awards honoring the best and the biggest Atlanta Ad agencies. Here are some of the highlights if you couldn't our didn't shell out the $100+ for a ticket:

    The Scene: Turner Field's 755 Club. With the Unviersoul Circus going on in the Turner Field parking lot there's no way of knowing how many people wandered in there "accidentally" instead. For those who made it up to the 755 Club, the view of the field alighting signs welcoming Atlanta's creative community were a nice touch, and a tremendous waste of electricity.

    The Fare: The kindest description of the standard buffet fare of sliced beef, over-cooked chicken, mashed potatoes and salad was "ho-hum." Fortunately, what lacked in the food was made up for in free flowing cocktails - no complaints there.

    The Crowd: 400 or so industry folks resisted the draw of the Universoul Circus and a night home watching Jersey Shore to come out. All the majors where there, including solid representation by BBDO, JWT, 22squared, and Ames Scullin O'Haire. Some production and digital shops made it as well. Razorfish wins for "Best Dressed," rocking the pants off the three piece suit. JWT wins for "Loudest," making their enthusiasm for even their Bronze award winning work abundantly clear (not that there's anything wrong with Bronze).

    The Talent: Lucky for Ad Club President Rich Fabritius, the crowd never quite quieted down enough during his welcome to hear his jokes, which means no one will remember that they weren't funny. Fortunately MC Steve Coulter (who holds writing credits on Tyler Perry's House of Payne) botched enough agency names during the awards presentation to provide sufficient amusement for at least the first half hour.

    The Awards: BBDO went for quantity, entering every piece for AT&T imaginable, for which they were awarded 37 awards (plus a dozen or so more for Georgia Power, Georgia Pacific and other less interesting clients like HP). Fitz + Co killed for RaceTrac and Dow GreatStuff. The rest of the bulk of the awards were fairly divided between 22squared, JWT, Ames Scullin O'Haire, breensmith and Brunner. Definition 6 deservedly won Best of Show for Coke Happiness. Of the student awards, Creative Circus, Portfolio Center and The Art Institute of Atlanta were all about even.

    Overall the event was reflective of the current economy - conservative opulence might be the best way to describe it - lots of people partying, glad to still be around.

    Big thanks to all our spies for scoping out the Addys for us, if you want to become a spy, e-mail us at atlanta {at} theegotist.com. We've got the AMY and SEED Awards coming up.

  • Are Your Kids Creatively FKD?

    / Comments (0)


    Research shows that the creativity of America's children, specifically those between the ages of 5 and 12, is declining. Just to clarify: this doesn't mean that our kiddos are showing reduced skillz with crayonz, it means their ability to solve problems without pre-defined answers is fading out.
    It would be nice to correlate this decline in creativity with a decline in overall intelligence, indicating some nasty flaw in the education system. However, the same kids with decreasing creativity scores are delivering increasing IQ scores – which is considered by many as a fair indicator of schools' health.
    Meanwhile, creativity has become the #1 sought after trait in today's executives (that's all executives, not just those in advertising), and our future depends on the ability of tomorrow's leaders to think in ways we've yet to fathom. Is our "fill in the blank" style of education destroying our kids' ability to think outside the – blank?
    The debates over education are dirty, political and rightfully complex, but at the end of the day, teachers can seem to find agreement in the following point of angst: today's educational system isn't making it easy to teach creatively, let alone teach creativity.

    What the system does seem to be doing (and what those declining creativity scores seem to confirm) is perpetuating the idea that for every problem, there is an answer, and if you don't have that one answer memorized, you won't just be wrong – your future might be at stake.
    It smells a lot like fear-based education. And nothing kills creativity like fear.
    Teachers are fearful that their kids won't make the cut if they don't fill in the right bubbles.
    Parents are fearful that their kids' futures will be sabotaged if they don't measure up to the given "standard." Kids, like grownups, are just fearful of failure, and when creativity goes unrewarded – or even punished – that's what it becomes associated with.
    No wonder they're getting less creative.
    Creativity is about taking risks, tenaciously pursuing something undefined, and feeling gratitude for the lessons (ie, the failures) we learn along the path to our answer. Some might even define creativity as the opposite of fear; a sort of open-minded courage to attack real problems without the safety net of pre-defined conclusions. In other words, creativity doesn't mesh well with the rules inherent to today's education system.
    An interesting challenge flew around the advertising world last week that hoped to directly address this problem. Dubbed No Right Brain Left Behind, the challenge was a sort of open source, pro-bono problem busting event, which resulted in buckets of potential solutions that are now living here. Global and boutique agencies participated, resulting in over a hundred ideas - some pretty feasible, some full of creative daydreams so lofty the education system would need a total restructuring to support.
    The challenge came with the hope of bringing a handful of the best ideas to implementation, which should be no fast feat in today's sluggish school system. So for now, if you're a parent, consider yourself responsible for keeping the creative zombies at bay - and don't forget to tell us how you do it.

    So... ideas?
    How Do You Design For Creativity?

    View more presentations from Bud Caddell.
    This piece is cross-posted on The Denver Egotist and Carmel's new blog.

  • Egotist Brief: Luke Sullivan

    / Comments (0)

    The following interview has been re-purposed from it's original posting on The Denver Egotist for your edification and enjoyment:

    A nationally acclaimed copywriter with a 30-year track record, Luke Sullivan is Senior VP/Managing Group Creative Director at GSD&M. He helps manage a creative department of 70 while continuing to work directly with Goodyear and the American Legacy Foundation.

    Luke is a self-described “ad geek” and the author of the best-selling book, Hey Whipple, Squeeze This: A Guide to Creating Great Advertising. Offering practical advice with an irreverent eye toward the history of advertising, the book was ranked by Advertising Age readers at #5 on the list of top 10 media and marketing books of all time.

    Luke’s experience includes 10 years at Fallon and five at The Martin Agency, with work for Miller Lite, United Airlines, Toyota, Black & Decker, BMW, Porsche and AT&T. He has more than twenty medals to his credit in the prestigious One Show and has served as judge for many creative award shows.

    He holds a degree in Psychology from St. Olaf College in Northfield, Minnesota and lives in Austin with his wife and two boys. He reports that he “enjoys the indoors” and likes to spend a lot of his time there.

    Luke is one of the main reasons we got into advertising and, to this day, is one of the guiding lights in our daily work.

    Q: You wrote one of the most famous advertising how-to books, Hey Whipple, Squeeze This. Are you sick of it yet – or at least those ad boners who still reference it?

    A: Hey Whipple has been a constant source of joy for me because so many young people write to me and say, “Hey, your book is what got me into the business.” That does NOT get old, I assure you. Feels great, knowing you had a positive effect on someone’s life (if luring someone into the dark alley of advertising can be described as positive). It’s in five languages now and the publisher just asked me to do a 4th edition. You’d think writing just a few new chapters and updating some of the work could be done quickly, bit it’ll likely take me most of the year to get that done.

    Q: You’ve worked in a number of cities across the US during your career. Do you believe in “creative hotbeds” and the momentum they carry – or is that a thing of the past since the advent of the internet?

    A: Back in about 1980, yeah, there were lots of articles in Ad Age about the “rise of the regional agencies” – Fallon, Wieden, Goodby, the usual suspects. But you’re right when you ask, “Did the internet change all that?” Sure did. The internet did that to the whole damn world (see The World Is Flat by Thomas Friedman).

    Q: What are the top 3 reasons you've never started your own agency?

    A: 1.) I liked doing the work too much and didn’t want to disappear in a Black Hole of Meetings. 2.) It’s a lotta damn work. 3.) Lazy.

    Q: What, in your opinion, is career suicide for an ad professional? Is working in-house or going client-side frowned upon?

    A: Beyond getting soft or stupid or compliant, I don’t think there is any particular career move that’s career suicide. I’ve got a buddy who went client side and I know any agency would snap him up in a minute if he wanted to come back. How about Goodby’s Mimi Cook, now a big shot at Apple? Think we wouldn’t love to hire her? As long as you’re in the game, thinking, pushing for better, cooler….who could fault you? I sure wouldn’t.

    Q: How do you think the role of the copywriter has changed, considering the present advertising environment that is predominantly visual-based?

    A: It has changed. Big time. And the best answer to that question is a great new book by the editor of Creativity magazine, Theresa Iezzi, called The Idea Writers: Copywriting in a New Media and Marketing Era. I can’t say it any better than she said it.

    Q: You talk about “craft” a lot and clearly take words and writing seriously. In your opinion, has social media turned us all into a bunch of half-literate monkeys?

    A: This is a question that goes back to, I dunno, the emergence of comic books. Comic books were supposed to turn teenagers stupid, then it was radio dramas that were supposed to do that, then TV, then rock and roll, then MTV. All these things were supposed to have turned us stupid. Which is silly. We got stupid on our own. We got “half-literate,” as you describe it, by not reading and not writing.

    Q: Speaking of craft, how do you bring it to digital?

    A: When writing on paper, you try to write well. Am I right? So do that when writing for online publication. When you’re art directing graphics for a TV spot, you try not to suck, right? So, don’t suck when you do that in digital. When you’re casting for a radio spot, you pick just the right voice, right? So, do the same for an online video. Seems to me craft is portable. I’m sure there are some crafts unique to online, but they’re probably about stuff like coding, or faster downloads, and compressions and a buncha stuff I don’t know. But as for all the other crafts associated with the creative business, aren’t they the same?

    Q: We noticed you have a relatively new blog, Hey Whipple. Convince those CDs and agency heads who think blogging is a waste of time that social media’s actually worthwhile.

    A: Nope, I refuse. Fact is anyone who can’t be “convinced” that the world is changing needs to be left behind. When you think about it, it’s kinda like that scene in old war movies, you know, where the guy is wounded but he doesn’t know it and his buddy has to leave him behind, so he gives him his canteen and maybe a handgun with a coupla bullets. Anyone who’s talking like that (“social media and all these dumb web things”) anyone talkin’ like that, they’re wounded and you gotta leave ‘em behind. (“Go on! Save yourself, kid.”) Give ‘em your canteen, wish ‘em well, and head out.

    Q: Which current campaigns do you wish you’d had a hand in?

    A: Apple. It’s always Apple that has me goin’ “Damn, I wish I did that.” I wish they hadn’t retired “Mac vs PC” but I always say that about good stuff. I’m sure they’ll do something extremely cool soon.

    Q: In all your years, what campaign were you the most stunned to have sold through and how’d you convince the client to buy it?

    A: Good question, to which I have a definite answer. It’s a radio campaign, for a teeny little client that we had at Fallon McElligott in 1995 and 1996. It was a technical school called Dunwoody. And they trained kids in what they once called “the trades.” You could get a degree in, say, heating and air conditioning, architectural drafting, computer repair, … you know, REAL jobs. I had a great client who never changed a word of copy, trusted that I had their best interests in mind, and just let me at it. I’ve posted my fave spots from this campaign on my blog.

    Q: Award shows – do they still serve a purpose, or are they outdated and unnecessary?

    A: I’m all over the map about this one. I grew up positively insane about working the awards circuit. I think that’s probably pretty normal for younger creatives.

    The reason? I see ad careers in terms of three stages. Early on, it’s about GETTIN’ FAMOUS. That’s what awards help do. Then, once you’ve got a bit of a name goin’, that’s when the juniors say, “Man, I oughta get paid more if I’m doin’ so great” which, of course, is when the second chapter kicks in – GETTIN’ MONEY. Then, when the final third of a career comes around, maybe when you got kids to worry about, a house, a spouse, when you have a life … well, but then it’s all about GETTIN’ STABILITY. You want a job that will last. You don’t wanna have to move your family around. So, with that sort of career track in mind, I get the whole awards thing.

    On the other hand, if you get too into awards, it’ll start to effect your work. Because now, instead of sitting down to solve a business problem and to write to a particular audience, you could be writing with an award show audience in mind. It’s conceivable one could begin to work with a sort of Super Bowl “How-can-I-amaze-everybody” kind of mindset, one that may not be right for the problem at hand.

    I’ll close with a several different paragraphs related to awards I wrote in Hey Whipple, Squeeze This:

    •••••••••••••••••••••••

    If there's ever a time to study the awards annuals, this is it.
    Study them. Read, learn, memorize. Don't just concentrate on the most recent issues either. Dig up old annuals. Design fads come and go, but the classic advertising structures endure. See what makes the ads work. Take them apart. Put them back together. Some of the ads are humorous and work. Some are straight and work. Why? What's the difference?

    Avoid trends in execution.
    Don't take your cues from design trends you see in the awards books. (For one thing, if they're in the books, they're already two years old.) But this is about more than being up-to-date. It's about concentrating on the soul of an ad instead of the width of its lapels.

    Leafing through the awards annuals is okay, too. Get some inspiration, but don't stay there too long. The shows are a good learning tool, early in the business; they're a good starting point, early in the ideation process. But at some point, they will begin to steer your thinking. Sooner or later, you're going to have to unmoor and sail into the unknown.

    On the value of awards shows.
    I shouldn't talk. In my younger days, I was a pathetic awards hound. Just around April, you'd find me lurking in the mailroom pining for "the letter" from the One Show announcing accepted entries. "Is it here yet? . . . Well, check againnnnnn."

    But I won't be too hard on myself. Our work isn't signed. And when you're new in the business, there's no better way to make a name for yourself than getting into "the books." Awards shows allow tiny agencies to compete with the behemoths. They serve as great recruiting tools for agencies. And they expose us to all kinds of work we'd not see otherwise. So I recommend them. With some caveats.

    Don't make the wrong name for yourself by entering too many campaigns for easy, microscopic, or public service clients. They might get in.

    Don't talk about awards shows around clients or account executives. You'll devalue yourself in their eyes and make your work suspect. ("Is that last ad she did on strategy or is it just another entry into Clever-Fest?'")

    Don't enter every show. As of this writing, there are 39 different national awards shows in this industry. No kidding -- thirty nine. And that's not counting the local shows. Only a few of them have merit. In my opinion, the best are The One Show and Communication Arts. And, in England, D&AD.

    •••••••••••••••••••••••

    Q: What do you think of the Victor & Spoils “crowdsourcing” agency model? How do you think it will affect the industry as a whole?

    A: Good question but I do not know the answer. Too early for this one to tell.

    Q: You have a magic fairy wand. If you wave it, you can change one thing about advertising that you hate. What do you change?

    A: Clients would no longer ask agencies to do creative for new business pitches. The clients would simply pick a few shops based on the kind of work they’ve done previously. Then the clients would visit each agency, get a feel for the people, and make a choice. I can think of no other business where we give away our product for free; where we work ourselves to the bone, where we lose weeks, weekends, holidays slaving away with limited information in a crunched time schedule, as we try to quickly throw together solutions for complex marketing problems…. and doing it all for free. I think it’s just an absolute shame. But until the whole industry locks arms and just says “No,” it’s gonna keep happening.

    Q: Your Thursday night talk for Ad Club Denver is called “How Not to Suck” – a topic near and dear to our hearts. Can you give us a little more insight into what we’ll be hearing you discuss? Why should we spend our Thursday night at your lecture instead of at the office working late like every other night?

    A: The title of my speech is actually “How To Suck Less,” not “How Not To Suck.” A very important distinction. We ALL suck from time to time, ain’t nuthin’ you can do about it. But we can all suck LESS. So, yeah, come on out on Thursday and I think you’ll get some information you can put into practice the next day. No kidding.

  • Egotist Brief: Noel Cottrell

    / Comments (2)

    Noel Cottrell is the newest and tallest member of the Fitzgerald+CO team. As Chief Creative Officer, he brings 19 years of experience to the table, including starting two of South Africa's most creative agencies (our words, not his) and starting the campaign with the adorably well invested babies for E*TRADE. Noel arrived in Atlanta at the same time as five inches of snow (coincidence, uh, no), and after the ice melted and he could finally make it into the office for the big first day, we tracked him down for an Egotist Brief. Atlanta, Meet Noel, and then join his posse.

    Welcome to Atlanta, when did you get here?
    I got here first week of January, and brought the bad weather with me from NYC. I have however been coming here every Summer for the last 13 years, stayed at the W Perimeter Mall and ate too many 'sexy fries' poolside.

    What's your favorite thing about Atlanta so far?
    I'm gonna cheat on this one and give two answers: BBQ and friendly people. And it is my belief that the one impacts the other directly. It's tough not to be friendly with a rib in your hand and a Sweetwater 420 at your elbow.

    What is your opinion of the Atlanta ad scene?
    Atlanta isn't perceived as an advertising market. It appears that the big Atlanta companies look elsewhere for their advertising. Even the big Atlanta Clients who use a local shop seem to have their account driven out of elsewhere. I think that some of the country's best ad agencies are in Portland Oregon, Boulder Colorado, San Francisco California, Richmond Virginia and Minneapolis Minnesota – and there is absolutely no reason such an agency couldn't exist in Atlanta, Georgia. In my brief experience it seems that the Account Services and Media departments of Atlanta ad agencies are are as strong as anywhere in the world, but perhaps at the expense of great creative advertising, rather than in partnership with it.

    What attracted you to Atlanta? To Fitzgerald + Co?
    What attracted me to Atlanta? There were a lot of reasons: 1) The CCO job at Fitzgerald+CO and the chance to help shape the future of one of the Southeast's best and longest standing shops 2) The lifestyle in Atlanta is much more similar to how I grew up in South Africa than Manhattan. I have a love-hate relationship with NYC. 3) My Mother-in-law and Brother-in-laws have lived in ATL for 15 years and my family and we've loved every visit we've made down here. What attracted me to Fitzgerald? The people at Fitzgerald & Co attracted me to the company. I'd interviewed at a few different shops for the CCO position around the country, but the interview at Fitzgerald sold me on the place. Really amazing, smart people who have a A+ client list and are hungry to do world-class work, in all media. From Karen their Receptionist of more than 20 years, to the sprightly leprechaun Dave Fitzgerald. And oh yes, they gave me an office – which I've never had.

    Creatively, how does Atlanta compare to the other places you've lived/worked (e.g. New York and South Africa)?
    If you look at the music industry in Atlanta, Hip-Hop in particular – Atlanta is one of the most creative cities there is. Atlanta has spawned so many artists and producers it puts other cities to shame. In terms of Advertising creativity I think it lags a bit. We have some unbelievable ad schools here and in New York I hired more than 10 Atlanta Creative Circus students in my time there. We need to get those graduating kids to stay in Atlanta and do amazing advertising right here at home. Although I say the local industry lags creatively, one of my 10 favorite creative ads of all time was a viral piece done by Fitzgerald+CO just over a year ago for Durex, titled 'Balloon Animals/Get It On' - it won at Cannes and I remember passing it on to friends and posting it on my Facebook wall. Here it is:

    That piece and the fact that it was generated by the agency played a large part in my accepting the position at Fitzgerald.

    Which Fitzgerald+CO client are you most excited to work with? Why?
    I think there are tons of great opportunities across the board , but I'd say given the long-standing relationship and the global nature of Coca-Cola and relatively new Client Amway, I'd say those are two Clients I can't wait to get stuck into.

    What was the most valuable lesson you learned starting not one but two agencies of your own?
    If you're in the shoe-making business, you better make freakin' amazing shoes if you want to be a success. If you're in the ad business, ads are your shoes.

    Some say the value of the Superbowl spot is overrated and in recent years some big advertisers have pulled their spots. What's your opinion?
    Given the dispersion of media, TiVO, DVR's, the growth of social networking, the proliferation of shows to choose from on cable etc – the Super Bowl offers a platform like no other. To quote close friend Tor Myhren: 'The Super Bowl is the last great campfire around which America gathers, you need to be telling your brand's stories around that campfire'.

    What advertising trend going on right now do you hate?
    Not that it is recent, but I hate gratuitous celebrity endorsement. Evil Knievel is the spokesman for the 'loaded' Pride Legend 3 wheel scooter for the elderly.

    Which do you admire? I love how producing shareable content for Social Media is becoming such a huge part of what we do. I used to spend about 10% of my time in the day working on this, it's now over 50%.

    Where do you find creative inspiration?
    Anywhere but advertising. The blogosphere is great for all the latest trends. If you don't know who 'Sad Keanu' is or you haven't experienced the joy of a double rainbow, you need to get online. Offline, I have 2 amazing girls and the coolest wife – and we do plenty that keeps me inspired. You ever been to the Chuck E Cheese in Norcross on a Saturday morning?

    What three pieces of advice would you give to any creative?
    1) Know what a good ad is – and do everything you can to keep knowing what a good ad is 2) Run from the admin 3) Wear a trucker hat and sport a solid beard – it's one of the few industries besides Trucking where you can rock that look and get respect for it.

  • Young Designers Make The Possible

    / Comments (2)

    There is no shortage of young designers in Atlanta trying to make their own opportunities. From the guys at EC Design Co, to last Fall's Chromatic show, there is no shortage of young designers in Atlanta trying to make their own way and their own opportunities. You can now add The Southern Design Concern and "The Possible" to that list as well.

    The Possible is the first exhibition by collective The Southern Design Concern, an Atlanta-based consortium of young southern designers (whether born and raised or transplanted here) started in late 2010 by Stephanie Aron, Shelton Davis, Travis Ekmark, Collin Farill, Skylar Morgan, Steven Sloan, and Josh Tuminella. Started out of a collective desire to create deadlines for personal projects, the group is an outlet and a venue for creative impulses that don't get expressed through client work. The founders were inspired by design clubs in New York, Chicago and Seattle, but honor the unique opportunities the South has to offer with The Southern Design Concern. According to co-founder Travis Ekmark, "Along with the cliches about friendliness and hospitality, we like the scrappy, resourceful, self-reliant attitude we frequently observe here. On top of that, there's a younger generation here that exhibits a genuine interest in sustainability, prioritizing local businesses, technology, social consciousness, and a prevailing pride in craftsmanship."

    Going on now at Octane in West Midtown (1009b Marietta St. NW, West Midtown), The Possible, which started as a way for The Southern Designer Concern founders to meet other Southern designers and design enthusiasts, features selections of modern home decor from Atlanta designers working in glassware, lighting, and furniture. Pieces from the collection are available for sale through the end of January from $4 to $2,000.

    The Possible features designers from all over the south, including these designers from Atlanta:

    Skylar Morgan
    Kristofer Lamey
    Red Bird Inc.
    Repurposed Goods
    People of Resource
    Collin Farill
    Christopher Moulder
    Tyler Held
    Travis Ekmark
    Steven Sloan
    Son & Son
    Nathan Reed & Patrick Dirito
    Matt Allen for Coca-Cola
    Laurel Wells
    Kevin Byrd
    Josh Tuminella
    Colleen Jordan
    Chris Held
    Camp Paper Goods

    What's next for The Southern Design Concern after January? They're currently planning their next exhibition that will debut during this summer's Modern Atlanta Design Is Human week and helping to coordinate a panel discussion during the week dealing with the exciting current resurgence of American design. We also hear rumors that they may be getting involved in some big out-of-state furniture shows as well.

    Interested in finding out more or getting involved in The Southern Design Concern? Get in touch with them at info@southerndesignconcern.com

  • There's More to Pitching Than Doing Killer Work

    / Comments (0)

    Well, it’s 2011. And the new year will see many agencies across the US, and the world battling for new accounts. But will the new year bring with it a completely fresh outlook on pitching for new business?

    Many up-and-coming agencies, and even more established ones, will face the following dilemma:

    Do you do work to win the account? Or do you do the best work you can?

    The uninitiated will no doubt think that the two are synonymous, but seasoned agency people will know that’s not the case. While some pitches require a genius strategy and bold creative ideas, others demand the opposite. The client may even be putting the account up for review because the incumbent agency is constantly delivering work that is too edgy, too risky or too challenging.

    Should you, or your agency, compromise your creativity and produce work that you know is mediocre in order to win the account?

    It’s an easy enough question if money does not come into play. Shit no!

    If you’re looking to build an agency, a good one, then you want to do it with accounts that trust your vision and give you the creative freedom you need in order to do genuinely good advertising. Doing mediocre work will not help that cause one bit.

    But unfortunately, the agency is staffed by people who want salaries. They need to eat and own cars and sleep in beds. Selfish bastards, the lot of them. And that means your agency may not be able to turn away every RFP because the creative opportunity isn’t there. Scruples are one thing, but going out of business to honor them is not going to help anyone. We all have to start somewhere after all.

    So, what do you do?

    Well actually, it’s more a case of what not to do.

    The biggest mistake I see agencies making is that they will do whatever it takes to win the business with the intention of doing better work later.

    “Yes, this is mediocre work, but we’ll get our foot in the door. Then, we hit them with the great work later on and win some awards.”

    Sorry, that almost never happens. I’m sure you know many agencies that have fallen foul of this strategy, and have a client roster that makes most creatives want to hang themselves or run screaming in the opposite direction.

    You win the pitch with safe, crappy work, the client wants safe, crappy work. If you go from Jekyll to Hyde six months into the relationship, they’ll be pissed. And rightly so. They selected you based on the work you showed them.

    Imagine dating someone who has the personality of a tame Sunday school teacher, and suddenly she starts slamming tequila shots, staying out until 4am and has the sexual appetite of Charlie Sheen. Hey, a lot of people like that, but you started dating the shy wallflower because that’s what you wanted. And if you were dating a hellcat that gave up booze and became a born again virgin, you’d be pissed, too.

    It’s a huge, huge error to expect the client to start accepting dangerous, edgy work when you purposely withheld it from the pitch. You did your homework, knew what the client wanted and gave them just that. A sudden turnaround on their part is not going to happen, at least not for many years or they have a sudden regime change.

    Just know that the client you’re going after is a cash cow, and that’s all. Getting the creative department’s hopes up that this sad cow will become something more fun to work on is just disingenuous.

    On the other hand, you could do your research and throw it to one side. You give the client a pitch that delivers, in no uncertain terms, some very wild, crazy and creative work that you know will bring in the customers. It’s a gamble.

    In that case, you now know that if you win or lose, you gave it your best shot. If you lose, you may live to fight another day. If you win, you win with great work. Remember, of course, that the client still may water down that pitch work, but you’re on much more solid ground.

    The other scenario is to turn your back on it. The RFP could require too much of your time and won’t be something you really want to win anyway. I’ve been in agencies where the owner halfheartedly announced that we won the credit card mailing pack pitch. Hurray. So exciting. It’s money, that’s all, and we never expected it to be anything more. And did we really need the extra money?

    If it’s sink or swim time, you bite the bullet and find work. Any work. You get clients that deliver the cash to pay the bills, and do great work for pro-bono clients that will get your agency noticed. Then, start replacing those bad clients with good ones, as and when you can afford to.

    But please, don’t ever try and pitch with poor work and expect a client to come around later. You’re not just kidding yourself but the rest of the agency.

    Originally written for The Denver Egotist

    Felix Unger is a site contributor, ranter and curmudgeon for The Denver Egotist. He's been in the ad game a long time, but he's still young enough to know he doesn't know everything. He'll give his opinion, you can take it or leave it. If he uses the f-bomb from time-to-time, forgive him. Sometimes, when you're ranting, no other word will do. In his spare time, he does not torture small animals. He has been known, on occasion, to drink alcohol by the gallon. Do as he says, not as he does. Email him at felix@theegotist.com.

  • What I Learned This Year #8: Juliet D'Ambrosio

    / Comments (2)

    Humility is underrated. The truth is, I know hardly anything about anything. It's my job to listen and learn as much as possible, and to translate what I learn in a way that moves people. Sometimes that means I have to ask dumb questions. Sometimes it means I have to ask for more help. I just know everyone I come in contact with has something to teach me, not the other way around.

    Atlanta's all right. I've always been lukewarm about the city, but this year, after more than a decade of living here, I noticed just how much there is to appreciate. Except for its inhuman sprawl, creepy overabundance of luxury sedans, dearth of good radio stations, and bizarre lack of pedestrian/streetlife, it's really not so bad. I've come into contact with other agencies and new clients that are doing work that ranks among the world's best; I've seen great bands—obscure, local, and big time—play; I've watched some cool theater, and seen some interesting art openings; I've eaten amazing food of every provenance; I've had my kids experience all sorts of superfun, superweird things; and I've met some very cool people. So maybe the Kool-Aid has had time to take effect, or maybe the A's not such a bad place after all.

    It's good to say no. I've got a full-time, demanding job, a class to teach, a husband, two kids (plus one on the way), a dog, a cat, a fish, parents and sisters and in-laws, and several awesome friends. There's only so much to go around. Sometimes the best thing I can do is say no, and be honest about my limits and about what I need to do my best work. Or just sleep.

    Shut up. I get more out of any interaction in which I listen more than I speak.

    It's a wonderful world. I've done a lot of work-related traveling this year, and it reminded me of what I love most: The world is so full of people who are smart and beautiful and cool and interesting whose experience and texture of daily living is so different than mine. It keeps me curious, grateful and most of all hungry to learn more. Aren't we lucky that we get to?

    Juliet D'Ambrosio is Partner & Editorial Director of Iconologic.

Rocket Fuel